Your cart is empty.
Your cart is empty.Allgood Automation
Reviewed in the United States on February 18, 2025
Works Well, I used a source from a CD-700 to verify the measurement.
Don Seguro
Reviewed in Canada on February 16, 2025
Tested it at the dentist and gave me the exact measures of radiation for the device used by my dentist. It has a color screen with graphics. You can set alarms and cumulative dosage thresholds. Good affordable device.
JJ
Reviewed in the United States on January 7, 2025
Bought this as a gift for my son and he love it. Easy to use
Customer
Reviewed in the United States on January 31, 2025
This Geiger counter is a reliable tool for detecting nuclear radiation. It's easy to use, with clear readings and a responsive display. The build quality feels solid, and the battery life is good. Perfect for professionals and hobbyists alike. Highly recommend!
Kyle K.
Reviewed in the United States on January 22, 2025
Teriffic gieger counter. Just plain love it. The only problem is that it doesn't make the classic gieger counter clicking noise. so if you want to have a clicking counter than this is not the counter for you. but there is a way to add the sound effects. you can find out how on YouTube. But now onto how good it is. It is very much worth the money. the size of it it very nice and portable. It's use is nice and easy. thanks for reading this review
Bab
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on January 13, 2025
I was fortunate enough to get the original legit version. Features the J321 GM Tube. Detects the radiation in my smoke detector well. Stock product does not have clicks.If you get the original version, it's good for the little money you pay.Upgraded mine with custom firmware and now got clicks and higher detection rate.
Gopalakrishna
Reviewed in India on September 3, 2024
Easy touse
gnikmit
Reviewed in the United States on September 19, 2024
I thought this thing was pretty neat at first.It seemed to reflect accurate background radiation. It seemed to provide readings on par with other devices when exposed to sample sources of radiation.After about a month of turning it on for a while now and then, it started showing background radiation about 2-3x normal. Next day, about 5x normal. Its default alarm level started to get set off. Then suddenly, no radiation detected, not even normal background radiation.It was a fun month, but now it seems to be useless.I do not recommend this product.-------------Update:The seller reached out to me and refunded me. I appreciate that.
No llego el producto
Reviewed in Mexico on August 21, 2024
Excelente
R Gee
Reviewed in Canada on November 20, 2024
I like the strong plastic construction, the clear display, and the mostly intuitive graphical interface .
Bob
Reviewed in the United States on May 10, 2023
So, she's a bit skittish.If it catches a few too many particles, too quickly, she goes up quick.No way to spread out the average, that I have found so far.That is NOT a problem, so long as you know wtf you are doing.TL;DR;Buy one. or 3. depending on your needs....I'm ordering another RIGHT NOW, same day I got the first.I have 2 Radex ONEs, which you might not be able to get anymore, and if you CAN, be suspect of them, as they are russian made.They are probably??? still ok?But I do NOT update them currently....Turned off auto update on the phone app also.I also have 2 RadiaCode 101's. but have not compared yet.Those are in deep protect. Wrapped up in Al Foil, no updates to the android app.A phone also wrapped...Same russia thing I think?I also have an olderhttps://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00EZBOVKA/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&psc=1which is unavail, but mine still works great.With that history, this device has an AVERAGE flaw, in that it will FREAK YOU OUT for a short term source.However, mine did recover pretty quick from a uranium ore exposure, so I am gonna recommend this as a short term warning device, with long term monitoring abilities also.If it starts screaming, vibrating, do what the shepherd said. ( Really? Get the FLOCK out of there!!! )Once it slows down, maybe keep moving away, but don't kill yourself in a hurry.I LIKE it.It DOES work well,and it is CHEAP, for what it does.Does it do anything special?absolutely not.Look at the Radex One, yeah, from Russia, if you can even find one now.Also the Radiascan RadiaCode 101, however, I just looked these up, and they are CRAAZY right now.I got mine for $300, some guy has em for $700!!!!!!!!!!!!!!That is crazy!Look for other things close to as good.Yeah, buy two of these. Maybe 2 others with good reviews also.Wrap one up in Al foil.....
V
Reviewed in the United States on December 12, 2023
This device is an absolute disaster and a scam. IT FAKES READINGS. When I decided to invest in a geiger counter for my personal safety and peace of mind, little did I know that my hard-earned money would be wasted on an absolute disaster of a device. The geiger counter I purchased, touted as a reliable tool for detecting radiation, turned out to be a nightmare in every possible aspect.The most important thing by far however are the fake numbers this geiger counter shamelessly produces. It's as if the device has a mind of its own, conjuring up figures that have no basis in reality. When placed next to a United Nuclear test card, it would completely make up fake numbers. Not only that, the CPM would always only change by weird, fixed pattern. This leads me to believe that they are making up numbers. This is absolutely unacceptable for a radiation detector that touts itself as a health tool.The geiger counter's battery life is nothing short of abysmal. It's as if the manufacturers took pleasure in designing a device that drains batteries faster than a leaky faucet wastes water. Within a very short period of time, the FNIRSIR began to lose charge quickly. In under a couple hours, it was fully dead with the device being very hot. This is absolutely unacceptable for a device that’s supposed to keep someone safe.But the cherry on top of this disastrous cake is the fact that the UI exacerbates the device's already apparent accuracy issues. The tiny, barely legible screen displays readings in a font size that requires a magnifying glass to discern. And when the readings themselves are as unreliable as a coin toss, struggling to decipher them due to poor UI design becomes an added insult to injury.In conclusion, the geiger counter I purchased has turned out to be a monumental disappointment. Its abysmal battery life, laughable accuracy, and propensity for producing fake numbers have shattered any semblance of trust I might have had in its functionality. I could forgive any of these problems if only it would actually accurately read radiation levels. I would strongly advise anyone considering buying this geiger counter to think twice and explore more reliable options on the market. Please look at the other 1 star reviews and videos and notice the random CPM and see how many people have the same problem I have. Your safety and peace of mind deserve better than this sorry excuse for a radiation detection device.
Recommended Products