maurizio
Reviewed in Italy on January 9, 2025
L'obiettivo riportato nella fotografia su questo sito ha il paraluce che non era presente nella scatola. Il prodotto è contenuto in una scatola anonima e manca la garanzia Canon. Venduto come nuovo ma a quanto pare non lo è. Pessima esperienza. Dato che è privo di scatola originale creno non si possa nemmeno restituire.
Ron S
Reviewed in the United States on January 21, 2025
Not a fast lens but light weight and sharp. I needed to lighten my load and combining this with my EOS R8 did the trick. Excellent value for the money.
Juan Carlos Valdes
Reviewed in the United States on March 25, 2024
We used it for our Canon R8 how our primary lens.
Mike
Reviewed in the United States on October 26, 2024
I am not a pixel/lens analyser .. is it as good as my Nikon Lenses.. yeah I would say so .. weights less .. have it on my Canon RP , coming from Nikon D750 .... now got In Eye-Autofocus .. , works pretty good ..also love the 85mm for Portraits of my grand children..
mLo68
Reviewed in the United States on January 17, 2024
The 24-105mm range is useful and on a Canon APS-C body...not so much, where it's roughly equivalent to a 39-168mm range. Sharp optics for a kit lens. Image stabilization works very well. The dim maximum aperture range of F4.0-7.1 is likely why this lens is "inexpensive"...but Canon has made kit lenses brighter than this in the past. Why is this one so dim? Overall, though, it's a good kit lens.
Luiza Emanuelle
Reviewed in Brazil on April 22, 2024
Como fotógrafa há alguns anos me surpreendi com essa lente especialmente para o cenário esportivo. Ela foi pensada especialmente para as mirroless e permanece bem em minha Canon RP. Apesar dela ser mirroless e pensada para nova geração substituindo o controle MF e AF para os controles da câmera não é algo que atrapalha muito.
john
Reviewed in the United States on June 6, 2023
purchased to use on my eos r. i acn now return the ef 'l' glass to my 6d ii
Sohil Hansraj Patel
Reviewed in India on May 28, 2022
Don't buy it it's not worth it. When u zoom it F number automatically increases
Miguel Andrade Castro
Reviewed in Mexico on April 14, 2022
Es una muy buena lente, lógicamente no tiene la calidad de una L pero por el precio que tiene es lo mejor que podrás comprar.
Tony Whitney
Reviewed in Canada on September 25, 2021
All Canon R users should have this lens in their bag. For shooters who lean towards wide angle work, it may be the only lens they need. It's light, sharp, very well made and quite inexpensive. Why buy a superfast zoom when cameras like the Canon R have such outstanding high-ISO capabilities?
The Dawg
Reviewed in the United States on March 9, 2021
I ordered this lens to go with my Canon EOS R5 as I could not obtain an EF-RF adapter. I also needed a lens in this focal length. The first one arrived DOA. I kept getting an error message. I even called Canon Technical support and was unable to get the lens to work. The item was returned for replacement. (See below about Amazon's shipping)I likely will not buy another Canon product from Amazon. Canon does not seal their boxes and my replacement from Amazon was shipped in the original box and left at my doorstep, I am only buying from a trusted vendor from now on (most canon prices are consistent across brands).Now, to compare this lens.I think it is a great lens for the price. I really needed a lens in this focal length for some of the projects I do, notably for long exposure images, I prefer the lighter weight and smaller profile of this lens.This lens is complementing my RF 100-500mm lens that is a superior lens at the 100mm focal length. That is an expensive lens. If I were not able to obtain the RF 100-500 as a complement or a 70-200. I would chose the Canon RF 24-240mm lens instead. I feel it performs comparably to this lens in the same focal range, but gives you a little higher performance at the 70-105mm range due to a lower aperture. I also would appreciate the extra 100+mm of zoom it affords.The next question is, how does this stack up to the RF 24-105mm f4 L? I would say decently. I tried both, the more expensive lens does have better image quality and more versatility at the higher focal legnth. I do a lot of telephoto work (wildlife, etc.) and decided to go with the cheaper F4-7.1 version here over the L-series lens due mainly to the price. I feel image quality is still excellent with the F4-7.1. Unless you need a lot of very low light, weather sealing, and uncompromising quality, I think you will be happy with the F4-7.1.
Cotharyus
Reviewed in the United States on February 15, 2021
At a fraction the cost of the f4 version, this is a no-nonsense budget zoom that's a great option for an every day walk around lens. Images are sharp, no real issues to speak of, AF is fast, stabilization works well, and it's even pretty light weight. Like all compromises it has upsides and downsides, but honestly, if you know the difference between this and the f4 version, you know you aren't getting L glass, and should expect L glass. The reality is for the price, this is a great little lens.
Moldy Taco
Reviewed in the United States on December 24, 2021
Very nice Lens, takes very clear photos.It also worked great with my telescope.