Your cart is empty.
Your cart is empty.This is a portable manual typewriter for on-the-go authors! The Black Royal Classic Manual Typewriter features metal construction, a wide 11 in. carriage, 88 characters, and a black and red nylon ribbon. It's ideal for those who prefer a retro look or easy typing without electronics.
Corn620
Reviewed in the United States on February 14, 2025
It will make you yearn for your old Smith Corona typewriter (why did I get rid of it). The keyboard layout is from the 50's, if you use a computer you will hit the wrong key, LOL . Examples: ' is over the 8, ! is next to the right shift, + is over the 1, etc. Makes it a little awkward. The typewriter itself wasn't set up right and I had to tweak it (I repaired teletypes in the Army so I knew a little). I hate the cover over the ribbons, it's hard to get off, not a good design at all.The typing itself is good. I think my disappointment is really in comparing it to the smith corona I had in the 70's which was a real solid machine.
Evanda Hall
Reviewed in the United States on January 8, 2025
We bought this for our daughter for Christmas! This was the only gift she asked for. Easy to use & easy to teach her to use! She is 7 and loves it!
Regiana Candido Rebelo
Reviewed in the United States on January 25, 2025
I am so in love with my type writer, I always wanted to buy one and now I have my own yeeeš„°š„°š„°š„°š„°š„°šššššš
Fred
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on September 5, 2024
Smart and neat typewriter. A bit stiff to use at first, but probably due to newness. Will have to get busy "running it in".
Rural Customer
Reviewed in the United States on August 26, 2024
This is the worse piece of junk I have ever purchased. Unfortunately, I didn't open the box to use the typewriter until yesterday, long after the return window had closed or it would have been returned immediately. It's poorly manufactured, the paper roller knob fell off, the roller would'nt work, the return carriage was broken, the keys tinny and difficult to push, the line spacing control didn't work, and the capital letter button was stuck because all small spring had not been attached. I will go in the garbage, a complete disappointment and waste of money. DO NOT BUY IT! Gave it one star, but only because I couldn't submit it without one.
cd
Reviewed in the United States on August 10, 2024
This is an old school typewriter, and even though newly manufactured, it requires some work to get it going just like the old ones..My first impression was 'why didn't I take all those negative reviews more seriously. 'I had all of the common complaints of other reviews after unboxing: strike not hard enough, half letters, half red letters. There is not much help on line so here is what I did.1. make sure all of the plastic holders for the carriage are removed, both sides.2. remove the metal bracket near the keys, not just the sticker. 𤣠it pops right out.3. the center ribbon holder seems to need to be pulled up, gently.It was after I pulled the center up and it made a very small click that I was able to get clear strikes.Most of these steps are just addressing the shipping safety features.Good luck.4 stars because I wanted it to work out of the box, not after an hour of troubleshooting.
AXO&Co.
Reviewed in Canada on March 29, 2024
Iāve wanted a new typewriter since I left mine when I moved out of my parents house 20yrs ago. How hilarious is that!?? I bought this one because of the royal brand and I love it. Itās seriously beautiful. Iām definitely an aficionado with zine nostalgia but I think this would be so amazing for any burgeoning typist. I love it!
Joanna Thomas
Reviewed in the United States on February 13, 2024
I am so disappointed in this typewriter, I could cry. I am a poet and visual artist, and I often include text in my work. I have a vintage Royal and a vintage Hermes, but was hoping to add a new, modern typewriter to my collection as well. The Royal Classic model 79104p is made in China, with many plastic (read cheap) parts. The typewriter shipped to me has a problem with the carriage roller in that it does not advance the paper; to roll a sheet into place, I must manhandle the paper, coaxing it into the carriage by employing the paper release lever. Also, the keyboard has crooked plastic keys, carelessly glued on, and the typewritten line is often misaligned. Although some of these idiosyncrasies are welcomed because I am an artist, if you are a serious writer, forget purchasing this machine. It's pretty much a piece of crap.
Ray d.
Reviewed in the United States on November 14, 2024
It's beautiful.
Cameron C.
Reviewed in Canada on January 4, 2024
My girlfriend is an aspiring writer and I got this for her to spice her hobby up a bit. She loves it. It works perfectly. Easy to use. It's satisfying to hear the constant clacking of metal as she spit balls ideas.
Schƶggl Walter
Reviewed in Germany on September 28, 2023
Diese Schreibmaschine ist eine absolute Frechheit. Funktioniert überhaupt nicht. Billigprodukt , keinen Euro wert.
martyne maheux
Reviewed in Canada on January 20, 2021
Facile Ć comprendre et Ć utiliser.
Patrick M Obley
Reviewed in the United States on March 22, 2019
WOULD I RECOMMEND THIS FOR HARD-CORE COLLECTORS? Sure.WOULD I RECOMMEND THIS FOR A BEGINNER: No. Freaking. Way.When I brought the new Royal Classic into my office this afternoon, an immediate din filled the air. My NOS Charger 11 doubled over in laughter. The Corona 3s shrieked. My refurbished Hermes Rocket wailed, āI thought you said you loved me!āThe Olivetti M40 and Studio 44 just shook their heads and, I couldnāt make out what they were saying, but I believe they were mumbling in Italian about my mental state. The Contessas said nothing because they were too busy staring at themselves in a mirror.The most interesting response, of course, came from the five Royals in the room, who all looked at each other and said, āWhose kid is that?āNow before I roll into a full appraisal of the Royal Classic, I think itās important that we analyze it in context of its peers, not its ancestors. Obviously, this guy isnāt going to measure up to any machine built before 1980. But hereās a quick recap of the other recent typewriter efforts attempted in the late aughts and 2010s:OLIVETTI MS-25/ROYAL SCRITTORE: I donāt know just how well these things can type out of the box because the first time I tried the Scrittore, the ribbon vibrator exploded at the ājumpedā portion of the quick brown fox sentence. I do, however, suspect these machines are an excellent fuel source on a cold night in the wilderness.ROYAL SCRITTORE II: If youāve seen one of these slappy claptraps, they are an obvious imitation of the rounded Olympia Traveller C. They work about as well as them, too. I found them to be an improvement, for whatever that is worth, and I must admit they are a favorite among the new typewriters because itās just fun to watch those typebars just flying around like someone hysterically waving their hands.ROYAL EPOCH: I think the makers really made an effort with this one, but the only way I can really describe it is with a Star Trek reference. Bear with me. In the original pilot episode titled āThe Cageā ā which was rejected by NBC ā Captain Pike encounters a human survivor on the Planet Talos. The survivor was badly injured when her ship crashed on the planet and the Talosians, who had never seen a human before, tried to put her back together as best they could based on information they cobbled from the downed ship. Apparently, the only thing they found was a DVD of āThe Hunchback of Notre Dameā because when they put her together ⦠well ⦠yeah. But the Talosians had really big brains and were masters of illusion, so they were able to cast her appearance to others as if she was real and spectacular. This is the Epoch. It was put together by rapscallions who found typewriter parts in a dumpster. They then handed their creations to someone who put them in a sleek ā if unspectacular ā body to make a buck.WE R MEMORY KEEPERS TYPECASTER: Stupid name, but I get it. I have two of these and they were among the weirdest experiences of my typewriter collecting life. When I took the first one out of the box, it was as if no one tightened its screws. It was inoperable. The carriage return lever was dangling. I was bored and I channeled my inner Talosian to put the thing back together in a close approximation of what it was supposed to be. Result: Amazeballs. It was a really surprising machine. The alignment was hopeless and each typed line looked like a flat street with speed bumps. But the feel was better than any of the previous new models and better than many 1970s machines. As you well know, the body design is probably the best of all the new machines and a clear inspiration for the Royal Classicās look. It is plastic and cheap plastic at that. Boo. I bought a second WRMK out of curiosity. It had none of the out-of-box issues of my first one. Its parts were all in the right place with the screws tightened and all, but I committed the sin of typing on it and the noises it made still haunt me. Itās gone now. I told my other typewriters itās living on a farm where it can run free.OK. The Royal Classic. Here we go:From the drop, as you probably expected as soon as you saw pictures of it, this guy is clearly a continuation of the We R Memory Keepers Typecaster. Itās so obvious that even in the ownerās manual, it is accidentally called a Typecast at one point. That led to an immediate and terrifying concern for me, considering its price. I bought this for $188, which is just $19 over the price Michaels charged for the WRMK. If they replaced the plastic with metal and chose to charge just $19 more for it? There had to be compromises in the build, be it the typewriterās function or the cheapness of the metal body.Good news: The metal is LEGIT. This is rock-hard, Grade-A steel. Everywhere. The only plastic bits are the keytops and the various knobs. Itās heavy. Itās sturdy. Most of all, itās bloody gorgeous. Somehow, the metal makes that much of a difference, aesthetically. If it can type even halfway competently, itās a machine Iāll keep in my office, in my rotation, and on display at all times.Bad news: It canāt type competently.Worse news: It actually hurts to type on it.There is a significant design flaw with the space bar. It is low-slung and has enormous give in it. When you hit it with your thumb, your digit will slam against the front of the frame. After just one sentence, I was feeling a dull throb in the side of my right thumb from striking the frame. Perhaps I can build up a callous. Cripes.This is a pica machine and the typeface pushes the bounds of just how big it can go. The alignment is erratic. One line is perfectly level, the next is a rollercoaster. That is a dark and frightening sign for the build quality. I consider an inconsistency like that to possibly be worse than if it was just simply a rollercoaster. Such a variance means the machining of the components was haphazard and lacked quality control.I call this sort of typewriter a Fernando ā āYou look MAHVELOUS! Itās better to look good than to feel good!āThe feel of the keys is decent enough. Itās like the Epoch and the WRMK in that the tops have a slight cupping to them for your fingertips. Itās comfortable for all your digits except your thumb, which will be giving its life in service to your screed. The keystrike itself is consistent, though the sound of the typebars is that same, annoying, chintzy echo. It has the weird tinny sound of all the others when you use the carriage return. The return isnāt very smooth and there was enough resistance early on that I wondered if I left a plastic stopper in it somewhere. I didnāt. It just needed to warm up.It does stay in place. No hint of migration as you type on it (this detail may vary ā I am using a felt pad underneath it).In conclusion: Our Chinese typewriter overlords get a lot of credit for continuing to try new things. The body is a clear and obvious improvement and it rivals the bodies of all our favorite 1940s and 1950s models. Really! I canāt believe Iām typing that, but itās true. They improved nothing else. I guess we just have to accept that for now. Maybe the next generation will contain build improvements. Iāll gladly pay a little more for that.Remember, back in the early- to mid-century days, buying a typewriter cost the equivalent of a high-end laptop. If they ever put that much effort into a typewriter again, it would probably cost $400-$500 and not find much of a market, so I get the shortcuts. However, itās a bit of a Catch-22 ā you arenāt going to make enough money on a cheap build to justify putting the money into a better build. If you had a better build from the beginning, thereās not a big enough market for typewriters to justify the expense.Will these new typewriters ever improve enough to rival their ancestors? Doubtful. But who knows. Maybe the materials will become cheaper and enable improved build quality. One can dream. In the meantime, Iāll probably be right here, buying every new attempt. I appreciate the effort. This latest typer is pretty, pretty, pretty and definitely an improvement style-wise. Sadly, the mechanics remain a mess, so when I say this typewriter is an improvement, all that really means is weāve progressed from an Edsel to a Pinto. If you are just starting out on your typewriter adventures, stick to Craigslist or eBay and find you a Smith-Corona Sterling or Super-Silent from the 1950s. It remains the simplest, smoothest and most ubiquitous machine on in the Typosphere. You can get one for less than the cost of this beast and it will last longer despite giving the Classic a nearly 70-year head start.
Recommended Products